[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070819010430.2c8c31fc@oldman.hemminger.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:04:30 -0400
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: discuss@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jh@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:55:11 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > The problem is that on x86-64 you are overriding memset()
>
> I don't. You must be looking at old source
>
> asm-x86_64/string.h 2.6.23rc3:
>
> #define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMSET
> void *memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
>
> I wanted to do the same on i386 too, but there were some minor obstacles.
> The problem is that the out of line fallback i386 memset is currently
> quite dumb and needs to be rewritten to expand the fill char on its
> own like the x86-64 version. Probably best would be just to port
> the x86-64 version. I just hadn't had time for that.
>
> [Patches welcome, but if you do ask me for my old memset test harness]
>
> -Andi
I am looking at current source, built with current (non-experimental) GCC
from Fedora Core 7. If I dissassemble ether_setup, which is
void ether_setup(struct net_device *dev)
{
...
memset(dev->broadcast, 0xFF, ETH_ALEN);
}
I see a tail recursion (jmp) to memset which is the code in arch/x86_64/lib/memset.S
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists