[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070820092125.937d6d2f.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:21:25 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Marc Perkel <mperkel@...oo.com>
Cc: Brennan Ashton <comphappy@...il.com>, Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>,
Michael Tharp <gxti@...tiallystapled.com>,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [OT] Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Marc Perkel wrote:
> My rant on VI is to make a point. That point being
> that when you use an editor that totally sucks then
> it's going to cause you to write code that sucks. It
> going to lower your standards. It's going to create a
> culture where poorly done work is considered
> acceptable. When you use an editor as poor as vi then
> the idea that rm * doesn't work becomes acceptable and
> justifiable, as demonstrated here by people who
> ACTUALLY DEFENDED IT.
so enlighten us. What editor do you use/suggest/push?
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists