[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708201346160.30353@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on
80386 and 80486
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Yes, I use it as synchronization mechanism for my buffer management algorithm
> in LTTng. Since I write in per-cpu buffers and want to be as reentrant
> as possible wrt other contexts (dealing with NMI as worse case, but also
> applies to MCE..), I use local_cmpxchg to reserve space in my buffers.
> It is faster than the standard cmpxchg.
Ok I have seen these numbers in the OLS papers but I could not reproduce
them in SLUB.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists