linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46C9317C.2080509@goop.org>
Date:	Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:15:24 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt
 issue

Chris Wright wrote:
> That did get backed out (at least the part that broke paravirt patching)
> in 602033ed5907a59ce86f709082a35be047743a86.  Linus' tree should be
> working fine right now with d34fda4a84c18402640a1a2342d6e6d9829e6db7
> committed, and can be further refined with the patch below that's just
> waiting on some further testing.
>   

I don't think this is necessary.  It isn't worth complicating the
interface to avoid the memcpy.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/