linux-kernel - Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46C94908.5080008@qumranet.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:55:52 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To:	Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism

Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>> Where did CONFIG_GUEST_ACCOUNTING go?
>>
>>     
>
> Lost in the sea ...
>
> Actually, I thought this modification is not enough expensive (in time and
> space) to justify a CONFIG_*. But if you think so I can add this in init/Kconfig.
>
>   

The difference between "convince everyone that it isn't expensive, 
including the embedded guys" and preemptively adding a config option can 
be quite large...

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/