[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070821103002.GA164@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:30:02 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: sukadev@...ibm.com
Cc: Daniel Pittman <daniel@...space.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...ru>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] fix /sbin/init signal handling
On 08/21, sukadev@...ibm.com wrote:
>
> I am still reviewing this patch and will try to plug in the multiple
> pid ns code and play with it some more in the next couple of days.
Thanks!
> But am curious why we need the in_interrupt() check and that too only
> for the container-init process.
For example, send_sigio(). We shouldn't send this signal to /sbin/init.
But what if the interrupted process is from the parent namespace?
> Also, maybe a dumb que, are the checks for SIG_IGN and SIG_DFL required
> both on sender side and the receiver side (get_signal_to_deliver())
get_signal_to_deliver() checks SIG_IGN/SIG_DFL, but I guess you meant
a special check for init.
Unless the patch is wrong, this is not needed. And, in fact we can't do
this anyway. Because get_signal_to_deliver() can't know if the signal
comes from parent namespace or not.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists