linux-kernel - Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:  <loom.20070821T034654-315@post.gmane.org>
Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:51:58 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Salah Coronya <salah.coronya@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.

Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell <at> digitalkingdom.org> writes:

> > Though I agree that it would be nice if we could convince all
> > subsequent requests to a server to fail EIO instead of just the
> > currently active ones.  I'm not sure that just changing "umount
> > -f" is the right interface though....  Maybe if all the server
> > handles appeared in sysfs and have an attribute which you could
> > set to cause all requests to fail...
> 
> I have no opinion on interface details, I simply know that on
> Solaris, "umount -f" Just Works, and I would love to have similar
> behaviour on Linux.
> 
> -Robin
> 

What you are looing is revoke()/frevokeat(); which will yank the file right from
under the descriptor. Its currently in -mm. Of course "mount" will still need to
iterate over each open file on the mount and revoke it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/