[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070821101404.GA1704@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:14:04 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: david@...g.hm, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump
Hi!
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Ping... is there some next version?
> >
> > I'm stuck at the tools side currently. kexec-1.101 just won't load the
> > kernel properly, and kexec-testing from git does not know -j option. I
> > tried hand-patching it, but got lots of scary rejects.
> >
> > Is there chance for a patch against kexec-testing?
>
> I have some other work to do recently. So the next version will delay
> for some while. :(
Ok, I got it to work -- thanks a lot.
Yes, acpi=off is mandatory. Unfortunately, thinkpad x60 does not boot
with acpi=off (should we add another test to linux firmware kit?
Machines should still boot in acpi=off mode...). acpi=off noapic
nolapic nosmp makes it boot, and that in turn makes kjump work.
Screen is not refreshed on kjump back to original kernel, but I guess
that's to be expected. I did not play with framebuffer, yet.
Maybe it is time to move kjump functionality into -mm and
kexec-testing?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists