[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497654.62822.qm@web36611.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
--- Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Ergo the only
> > > people who should be writing security policy for deployment are those
> > > people who have studied and trained in the stuff. Those people are
> > > also known as "security professionals".
> >
> > If only security professionals can use the system you have failed
> > to provide a general purpose facility. It may have value in limited
> > circumstances but it is not for everybody.
>
> But that's okay. Maybe SElinux is not simple enough to use for
> everyone, but that does not mean you can't auto-generate policy from
> something else, "easy to understand". IOW smack may be great idea,
Thank you.
> but you written it in wrong language. You
> written it in C, while you should have written it in SELinux policy
> language (and your favourite scripting language as frontend).
I have often marvelled at the notion of a simplification layer.
I believe that you build complex things on top of simple things,
not the other way around.
Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists