[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d6222a80708211401g6c88753cyd239006b5ed00aea@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:01:51 -0300
From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <glommer@...il.com>
To: "Segher Boessenkool" <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jarek Poplawski" <jarkao2@...pl>, "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>,
"Chris Wedgwood" <cw@...f.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0
On 8/21/07, Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > Last time I tried a mips build, it would fail the compile unless I was
> > using _exactly_ 3.4.4 (I didn't tried older versions, but did try
> > 3.4.6, for ex.).
>
> If 3.4.4 works where 3.4.6 doesn't, you should report this as a
> bug; either here, or to the GCC team (but please be aware that the
> 3.4 series isn't supported anymore), or to whoever built that
> compiler for you.
I didn't bothered reporting it here because linux-mips website quotes
explicitly the dependency on 3.4.4. So at least, I imagined they are
aware of it. (And as you said, no point in reporting it to gcc...)
> > So I also think the 3.4 series will still have to be
> > around for a while.
>
> Huh? 3.4 doesn't work for you, so that's why it should stay
> a supported compiler?
3.4.4 does. anyway, by this phrase, I only meant: "Dropping support
for 3.4 series won't help in this case"
--
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net
"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists