linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dkegel@...gle.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks

On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > What is preventing that from occurring right now? If the dirty pags are
> > aligned in the right way you can have the exact same situation.
> 
> For one, dirty page writeout is done even when free memory
> is low.  The kernel will dig into the PF_MEMALLOC reserves,
> instead of deciding not to do writeout unless there is lots
> of free memory.

Right that is a fundamental problem with this RFC. We need to be able to 
get into PF_MEMALLOC reserves for writeout.
  
> Secondly, why would you want to recreate this worst case on
> purpose every time the pageout code runs?

I did not intend that to occur.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/