linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local

On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> SLUB Use cmpxchg() everywhere.
> 
> It applies to "SLUB: Single atomic instruction alloc/free using
> cmpxchg".

> +++ slab/mm/slub.c	2007-08-20 18:42:28.000000000 -0400
> @@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@ redo:
>  
>  	object[c->offset] = freelist;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(cmpxchg_local(&c->freelist, freelist, object) != freelist))
> +	if (unlikely(cmpxchg(&c->freelist, freelist, object) != freelist))
>  		goto redo;
>  	return;
>  slow:

Ok so regular cmpxchg, no cmpxchg_local. cmpxchg_local does not bring 
anything more? My measurements did not show any difference. I measured on 
Athlon64. What processor is being used?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/