[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708211614370.6062@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> SLUB Use cmpxchg() everywhere.
>
> It applies to "SLUB: Single atomic instruction alloc/free using
> cmpxchg".
> +++ slab/mm/slub.c 2007-08-20 18:42:28.000000000 -0400
> @@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@ redo:
>
> object[c->offset] = freelist;
>
> - if (unlikely(cmpxchg_local(&c->freelist, freelist, object) != freelist))
> + if (unlikely(cmpxchg(&c->freelist, freelist, object) != freelist))
> goto redo;
> return;
> slow:
Ok so regular cmpxchg, no cmpxchg_local. cmpxchg_local does not bring
anything more? My measurements did not show any difference. I measured on
Athlon64. What processor is being used?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists