[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440708211658j1fb2a8caj41e1bb8bffa4baf4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:58:56 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Chandramouli Narayanan" <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Aaron Durbin" <adurbin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86_64 EFI runtime service support
On 8/21/07, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 03:41:44AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >> - "struct boot_params" (the zeropage) is kept as a legacy interface.
> > >
> > > Legacy interface for what? Just for kexec utils which never should
> > > have been using it anyways keeping backwards cruft around seems
> > > misplac.ed
> >
> > Worse. LinuxBIOS. :(
>
> Sigh. Perhaps it should be renamed AntiLinuxBios: it seems to be actively adverse.
current LinuxBIOS's path: the elfboot in LinuxBIOS will prepare the
e820 table, and jump to startup_32 in kernel. is that not good and
simple? kernel is not supposed to switch back and forth to get such
memmap...
Why not using ACPI mean AntiLinux?
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists