linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git for-linus branch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200708221044.48933.ossrosch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:44:48 +0200
From:	Stefan Roscher <ossrosch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	general@...ts.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git for-linus branch

Hi Roland,

On Thursday 16 August 2007 18:19, Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > Hmm, if these things are appropriate for 2.6.23, maybe my patch
>  > adding linux/mutex.h to ehca_classes.h can go in too?
> 
> Actually I queued Dotan's patches quite a while ago, although Linus
> seems to be ignoring my pull requests.
> 
> I don't see any urgency in adding more similar patches to 2.6.23,
> since AFAIK 2.6.23 builds fine, right?

Yes, there is no build issue with 2.6.23. 
We have realized on rhel4.5 that linux/mutex.h needs to be included
explicitly.
Thus, I'm fine with your decision.
> 
> Also I would prefer to get ehca patches from the ehca people at IBM,
> or at least an ack from them.

Acked-by: Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...ibm.com>

regards Stefan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/