linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070822102217.GE2642@bingen.suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:22:17 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt

On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:23:14PM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> In general, I/O in a virtual guest is subject to performance problems.  
> The I/O can not be completed physically, but must be virtualized.  This 
> means trapping and decoding port I/O instructions from the guest OS.  
> Not only is the trap for a #GP heavyweight, both in the processor and 
> the hypervisor (which usually has a complex #GP path), but this forces 
> the hypervisor to decode the individual instruction which has faulted.  

Is that really that expensive? Hard to imagine.

e.g. you could always have a fast check for inb/outb at the beginning
of the #GP handler. And is your initial #GP entry really more expensive
than a hypercall? 

> Worse, even with hardware assist such as VT, the exit reason alone is 
> not sufficient to determine the true nature of the faulting instruction, 
> requiring a complex and costly instruction decode and simulation.

It's unclear to me why that should be that costly.

Worst case it's a switch()

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/