[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070822131547.GS32640@bingen.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:15:47 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
> Ah. But that's mostly modules, so real in-core changes should be very
Yes that's the big difference. Near all paravirt ops are concentrated
on the core kernel, but this one affects lots of people.
And why "but"? -- modules are as important as the core kernel. They're
not second citizens.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists