linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0708220707390.9414@us.intercode.com.au>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
cc:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote:

> Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter.
> So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should
> be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables
> secmark rule.

Michal, do you see this in current git?


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/