[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46CC6150.6050105@vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:16:16 -0700
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> Since this is only for newer kernels, won't updating the driver to use
> a hypercall be more efficient? Or is this for existing out-of-tree
> drivers?
Actually, it is for in-tree drivers that we emulate but don't want to
pollute, and one out of tree driver (that will hopefully be in tree
soon!) that has no way to determine if making hypercalls is acceptable.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists