[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46CC6420.2030506@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:28:16 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86_64 EFI runtime service support
huang ying wrote:
>
> My proposal: Use Peter proposed "linked list of struct setup_data"
> style boot protocol as long term goal.
>
> To smooth the transforming process, the following back compatible
> scheme can be taken:
>
> 1. Keep zero page as an informal external boot protocol, and marked it
> as deprecated for external usage.
> 2. Add a magic number to standard boot protocol, which is set by
> bootloader to indicate the new style or old style boot protocol is
> used.
> 3. Add the pointer to "linked list of struct setup_data" to standard
> boot protocol.
> 4. If kernel is booted with correct magic number, the kernel will
> convert "linked list" to zero page, or use "linked list" directly. If
> kernel is booted with incorrect magic number, the kernel will use the
> "zero page" from bootloader or convert "zero page" to "linked list".
>
You're making it needlessly complicated.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists