| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:33:31 -0700 (PDT) From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com> cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 22/08/07, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > > > Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter. > > > So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should > > > be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables > > > secmark rule. > > > > Michal, do you see this in current git? > > No, I do not see this problem in 2.6.23. I had similar problem last > month, but it is fixed now. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/12/362 The previous problem is theoretically unrelated. It arose via a separate mechanism which can't be used at the same as the one you're seeing now in the logs. So this either looks like a problem which has gone unnoticed and was inadvertently fixed at some point, or is unique to the 2.6.20 stable series. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists