[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46CC6C4B.1030202@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:03:07 +0200
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, akepner@....com,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rdreier@...co.com,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: override "dma_flags_set_dmaflush" for sn-ia64
James Bottomley wrote:
> I really don't think a work around for a PCI spec violation belongs in
> the generic DMA code, do you? The correct fix for this should be to set
> the device hints to strict ordering, which presumably altix respects?
> In which case, it sounds like what needs exposing are access to the PCI
> device hints. I believe both PCI-X and PCIe have these hints as
> optional specifiers in the bridges, so it should be in a current Rev of
> the PCI spec. Or are you proposing adding an additional PCI API that
> allows transaction flushes to be inserted into the stream for devices
> and bridges that have already negotiated relaxed ordering? ... in which
> case we need to take this to the PCI list.
James,
I don't believe it respects those hints - I agree, it's a pita, but
thats the state of the situation. Even if it did, it would make
performance suck as Jesse also pointed out.
As I pointed out in my email to Willy is that the NUMA fabric is routed,
there's not one path through the system, which is what makes this
happen.
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists