linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1: WARNING: during resume from suspend on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:30:01 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1: WARNING: during resume from suspend on x86_64

On Wednesday, 22 August 2007 11:06, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc3/2.6.23-rc3-mm1/

I get this during resume from suspend to RAM and during hibernation:

WARNING: at /home/rafael/src/mm/linux-2.6.23-rc3-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c:380 smp_call_function_single()

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8021a97d>] smp_call_function_single+0x52/0xff
 [<ffffffff8022e703>] task_rq_lock+0x3d/0x6f
 [<ffffffff80230fc0>] set_cpus_allowed+0xbf/0xcc
 [<ffffffff802141ab>] sc_freq_event+0x5f/0x63
 [<ffffffff80431c38>] notifier_call_chain+0x33/0x65
 [<ffffffff8024c11f>] __srcu_notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0x69
 [<ffffffff8024c14c>] srcu_notifier_call_chain+0xf/0x11
 [<ffffffff803bcfa4>] cpufreq_resume+0x131/0x157
 [<ffffffff8038151c>] __sysdev_resume+0x34/0x73
 [<ffffffff80381b76>] sysdev_resume+0x1f/0x61
 [<ffffffff803865e8>] device_power_up+0x9/0x10
 [<ffffffff80256620>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xbf/0xf7
 [<ffffffff802567bb>] enter_state+0x163/0x1e5
 [<ffffffff802568e1>] state_store+0xa4/0xc2
 [<ffffffff802d7bc5>] subsys_attr_store+0x31/0x33
 [<ffffffff802d7e8d>] sysfs_write_file+0xe0/0x11c
 [<ffffffff80293b77>] vfs_write+0xc7/0x150
 [<ffffffff802940f8>] sys_write+0x47/0x70
 [<ffffffff8020bdce>] system_call+0x7e/0x83

Apparently, smp_call_function_single() is unhappy, because it's called with
interrupts disabled by sc_freq_event() executed (as a notifier) by
cpufreq_resume().  However, cpufreq_resume() is always run with one CPU on
line, so all this stuff should be handled differently.  Oh, dear.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/