linux-kernel - Re: [autofs] [PATCH] autofs4: reinstate negatitive timeout of mount fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1187753262.3899.13.camel@raven.themaw.net>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:27:42 +0800
From:	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	autofs mailing list <autofs@...ux.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [autofs] [PATCH] autofs4: reinstate negatitive timeout of
	mount fails

On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 10:56 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 13:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > It seems to use a lot of list_for_each[_safe] which could
> > have been coded as list_for_each_entry[_safe], btw.
> 
> Mmm .. good point. I've not noticed the list_for_each_entry* macros.

A good idea but that change would cover more than just this patch so I'd
rather leave the patch as is and submit a cleanup patch to cover this
later.

Ian


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/