linux-kernel - Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070822143813.a78ed233.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:38:13 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tech Board Discuss 
	<Tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory
 Board Elections

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:

> * Dave Jones (davej@...hat.com) wrote:
> > I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> > Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> > of "why you should vote for me" type statement.  Does such a thing
> > exist for this process ?
> 
> Last year each nominee made a statement as you describe before
> the votes were cast (during the voting session).

and if they won't be present?

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/