[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708230415010.2049@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:17:03 +0530 (IST)
From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Redefine register_hotcpu_notifier() !HOTPLUG_CPU stub as
static inline function
The present do {} while stub's return cannot be checked, but the real
HOTPLUG_CPU=y implementation of register_hotcpu_notifier() is int-
returning. So let us make this stub consistent with the full version.
Redefining this as such will also help us remove some #ifdef-ery
elsewhere in kernel code, as shown in forthcoming patch.
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 1d5ded0..ed6fa22 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -119,7 +119,10 @@ static inline void cpuhotplug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *cpu_hp_mutex)
#define lock_cpu_hotplug() do { } while (0)
#define unlock_cpu_hotplug() do { } while (0)
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
-#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) do { (void)(nb); } while (0)
+static inline int register_hotcpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) do { (void)(nb); } while (0)
/* CPUs don't go offline once they're online w/o CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists