lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070823071332.GA4559@bogon.ms20.nix>
Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:13:32 +0200
From:	Guido Guenther <agx@...xcpu.org>
To:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc:	Mike Mohr <akihana@...il.com>, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...e.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
Subject: Re: group ownership of tun devices -- nonfunctional?

Hi,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:42:54PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > I can create devices that are owned by my user account (tunctl -u
> > `whoami` -t tap0) and it works fine.  However, if I use group
> > permissions with -g it stops working.  In all cases, if I pass -g
> > <group>, the interface is created correctly but it is unusable as a
> > non-root user.
> 
> I can't reproduce this - it seems to work fine on -rc3-mm1:
Works fine here too. I had a similar report and there seems to be some
confusion since the group has to be the processes effective group not
any supplementary group the user happens to be in. Could that be the
problem here too?
Cheers,
 -- Guido
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ