[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070823103846.GB10435@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:38:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: skip updating rq's next_balance under null SD
* Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> Was playing with sched_smt_power_savings/sched_mc_power_savings and
> found out that while the scheduler domains are reconstructed when
> sysfs settings change, rebalance_domains() can get triggered with null
> domain on other cpus, which is setting next_balance to jiffies +
> 60*HZ. Resulting in no idle/busy balancing for 60 seconds.
>
> Fix this.
thanks, applied.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists