linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1187890919.6114.411.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:41:59 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	spamtrap@...bisoft.de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v9

On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 08:59 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> --- Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 05:49 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > 
> > > Peter,
> > > 
> > >  any chance to get a rollup against 2.6.22-stable?
> > > 
> > >  The 2.6.23 series may not be usable for me due to the
> > > nosharedcache changes for NFS (the new default will massively
> > > disturb the user-space automounter).
> > 
> > I'll see what I can do, bit busy with other stuff atm, hopefully
> > after
> > the weekend.
> > 
> Hi Peter,
> 
>  any progress on a version against 2.6.22.5? I have seen the very
> positive report from Jeffrey W. Baker and would really love to test
> your patch. But as I said, anything newer than 2.6.22.x might not be an
> option due to the NFS changes.

mindless port, seems to compile and boot on my test box ymmv.

I think .5 should not present anything other than trivial rejects if
anything. But I'm not keeping -stable in my git remotes so I can't say
for sure.

View attachment "bdi-rollup-v9-v2.6.22.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (69879 bytes)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)