[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14578.1187899540@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:05:40 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> This simply isn't true. The compiler *can* combine asm stuff:
>
>
> typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
>
> static inline __attribute__((pure)) int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
> {
> int x;
> asm("ld %0,@%1" : "=r"(x) : "r"(&v->counter), "m"(v->counter));
> return x;
> }
That's not precisely combining asm stuff. The compiler is ditching a whole
function because you've told it it can cache the result.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists