[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1187847296.16369.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:34:56 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 22:25 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I still think it's preferable to change some drivers than everybody.
> >
> > AFAIK BusLogic as real hardware is pretty much dead anyways,
> > so you're probably the only primary user of it anyways.
> > Go wild on it!
>
> I don't believe anyone is materially maintaining the buslogic driver and
> in time its going to break completely.
>
> > Well that might be. I just think it would be a mistake
> > to design paravirt_ops based on someone's short term release engineering
> > considerations.
>
> Agreed, especially as an interface where each in or out traps into the
> hypervisor is broken even for the model of virtualising hardware.
I'd really like lguest guests not to do ins and outs, but that's likely
to be more invasive a change than this. We do it to find the PCI bus
IIRC, and a couple of other early probe bits.
It's just unfortunate that it's the one place lguest has to emulate
because of lack of paravirt_ops coverage.
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists