linux-kernel - Re: what is the value of the macro "__setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070824095058.GA32013@linux-sh.org>
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:50:58 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: what is the value of the macro "__setup_param"?

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:19:29AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   perhaps i'm missing it, but it seems that the macro __setup_param is
> entirely superfluous:
> 
> $ grep -rw __setup_param *
> include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn, early)      \
> include/linux/init.h:   __setup_param(str, unique_id, NULL, 0)
> include/linux/init.h:   __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 0)
> include/linux/init.h:   __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 1)
> include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn)  /* nothing */
> $
> 
> or am i must misreading something badly?
> 
Superfluous how? It does different things depending on whether MODULE is
defined or not. It's a good indicator of how often people use
__setup_param() from module context though, given the complete mismatch
of parameters. It's probably worth fixing that up at least.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/