linux-kernel - Re: what is the value of the macro "__setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708240559450.16247@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:01:55 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: what is the value of the macro "__setup_param"?

On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:49:42AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:19:29AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   perhaps i'm missing it, but it seems that the macro __setup_param is
> > > > entirely superfluous:
> > > >
> > > > $ grep -rw __setup_param *
> > > > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn, early)      \
> > > > include/linux/init.h:   __setup_param(str, unique_id, NULL, 0)
> > > > include/linux/init.h:   __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 0)
> > > > include/linux/init.h:   __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 1)
> > > > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn)  /* nothing */
> > > > $
> > > >
> > > > or am i must misreading something badly?
> >
> > > Superfluous how? It does different things depending on whether
> > > MODULE is defined or not. It's a good indicator of how often people
> > > use __setup_param() from module context though, given the complete
> > > mismatch of parameters. It's probably worth fixing that up at least.
> >
> > never mind, i've already clued in.  up too long, and trying to do too
> > many things at once.  more sleep or more coffee -- time to make a
> > decision.  sorry for the noise.
> >
> That's great, but you've ignored the second part of my mail. I'll
> summarize:
>
> > > > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn, early)      \
> > > > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn)  /* nothing */
>
> Notice the problem now? :-)

oh, certainly.  i'm just thinking that, in my condition, i shouldn't
be allowed to submit patches or operate heavy machinery at the moment.
:-)

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/