linux-kernel - Re: false positive in checkpatch.pl (complex macro values)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:22:46 +0200
From:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To:	SL Baur <steve@...acs.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: false positive in checkpatch.pl (complex macro values)

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:43:47AM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
> Who uses code like this, by the way?

People who think Posix is an example to follow maybe?  Not sure if it
would go past the maintainers though :-)

# define PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER \
  { { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, { 0 } } }
# ifdef __USE_GNU
#  define PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP \
  { { 0, 0, 0, PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP, 0, { 0 } } }
#  define PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP \
  { { 0, 0, 0, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK_NP, 0, { 0 } } }
#  define PTHREAD_ADAPTIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP \
  { { 0, 0, 0, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ADAPTIVE_NP, 0, { 0 } } }
# endif

  OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/