[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070824012730.GA1243@hexapodia.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:27:30 -0700
From: Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Tech Board Discuss
<Tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ksummit-2007-discuss@...nk.org
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:07PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > While I think that's laudable, we definitely don't have the resources
> > for that, as everyone on the TAB already has a full workload. And it
> > hardly seems worth the trouble for a once-a-year election.
>
> Exactly ... we want a process that's simple and transparent. We chose
> voting at the KS because almost all the attendees satisfy the "made
> significant contributions to Linux" requirement without us having to do
> anything or make any controversial determinations. Like Matt said,
> better suggestions are welcome.
This is a dumb suggestion, but...
How about one vote per git commit merged to linus' tree?
Might be worthwhile to allocate votes for Acked-By and so on, as well.
-andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists