[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070824032228.GJ21720@waste.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:22:28 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Tech Board Discuss
<Tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ksummit-2007-discuss@...nk.org
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community.
>
> As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not like
> it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in SPI. And
> somebody else takes care of the bureaucracy for you.
Ahh, I didn't realize you were suggesting making -them- do the work
instead of just stealing their model. I suppose that could work,
provided no one finds being an SPI member objectionable and they'd
provide us with their member list.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists