[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070825182846.GN30705@stusta.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:28:46 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove securebits
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:50:10PM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>
> FWIW, in the mm kernel, I've actually already removed them when one
> configures without capabilities.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc3/2.6.23-rc3-mm1/broken-out/v3-file-capabilities-alter-behavior-of-cap_setpcap.patch
>
> Other than writing a custom module, so far as I can tell, there is/was
> no way to set them anyway.
>
> I'd obviously prefer to wait for the mm-merge process to complete and
> minimize the churn in this area, but I basically agree that the bits as
> implemented are pretty useless in their current form. In a per-process
> mode (with filesystem capability support) they are much more useful...
It was in the tree for nine years (sic) without a single user...
Are you only improving a dead horse, or do you also have a rider for the
improved dead horse?
> Cheers
>
> Andrew
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists