[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070826160125.GQ11718@lug-owl.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:01:25 +0200
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>
To: Peter Firefly Lund <firefly@...64.dk>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, trivial@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Momchil Velikov <velco@...ata.bg>
Subject: Re: [LV] [PATCH] avoid negative shifts in radix-tree.c
On Sat, 2007-08-25 16:26:07 +0200, Peter Firefly Lund <firefly@...64.dk> wrote:
> --- lib/radix-tree-old.c 2007-08-25 15:36:40.000000000 +0200
> +++ lib/radix-tree.c 2007-08-25 15:36:51.000000000 +0200
> @@ -980,12 +980,14 @@ radix_tree_node_ctor(void *node, struct
>
> static __init unsigned long __maxindex(unsigned int height)
> {
> - unsigned int tmp = height * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
> - unsigned long index = (~0UL >> (RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS - tmp - 1)) >> 1;
> -
> - if (tmp >= RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS)
> - index = ~0UL;
> - return index;
> + unsigned int tmp =
> + int shift = RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS - height * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long index;
> +
> + if (shift < 0)
> + return ~0UL;
> + else
> + return ~0UL >> shift;
> }
>
> static __init void radix_tree_init_maxindex(void)
`index' seems to be unused now? And indention does neither follow
kernel coding style, nor this file's style. You'd also hammer out
`tmp' and put its initializer right there where it's used.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@...-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: Träume nicht von Dein Leben: Lebe Deinen Traum!
the second :
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists