[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708261940230.15614@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:42:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Fred Tyler <fredty8@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20
On Aug 26 2007 12:58, Fred Tyler wrote:
>> So I guess you are not seeing any memory leak at all, but just the regular
>> caching?
>
>Also, how can you explain the differences between the graphs of
>long-term memory usage? This first graph is from a server running
>2.6.16 that never has memory problems:
>
> http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff117/fredty8/memory-a4.png
>
>And here's a graph of a server running 2.6.12 that has to be rebooted
>every month or two because it runs out of memory:
>
> http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff117/fredty8/memory-a2.png
Indeed that looks like a leak. But perhaps it would be helpful to not only
match MemFree Buffers and Cached (from /proc/meminfo) but also Slab.
>Now, admittedly, the 2.6.20 server has not been running long enough to
>know whether or not it's going to start starving applications of
>memory, but the graph here looks a whole lot more like 2.6.12 than
>2.6.16, wouldn't you agree:
>
> http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff117/fredty8/memory-b1.png
But it looks like.
>Those 2.6.12 servers caused me a ton of stress because I let the
>problem go too long before I did anything. In the event that 2.6.20 is
>doing the same thing, I'm trying to fix it before things get out of
>control.
>
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists