[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708262038170.12920@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:43:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
cc: parisc-linux@...ts.parisc-linux.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
parisc-linux@...isc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] errno codes intertwined
On Aug 26 2007 13:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> can I rely on the same errno across Linuxes?
>
>nope
>
>> And should the errno values be fixed up?
>
>i guess that depends on whether you think it's even broken :)
>
>no spec requires any errno symbol have an exact numeric value ... i'm guessing
>your FUSE is only cross-Linux and you're not planning on dipping into any
>other OS ?
If the errnos are not the same in the Linux world, it's not even
cross-Linux ;-) - but it's always translated to fixed numbers now anyway.
I have not really thought about putting it in use on other systems yet. I
don't have macosx to test, and Windows generally lacks some fuses. :^)
You are free to spin it if you like, http://freshmeat.net/p/ccgfs/
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists