[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200
From: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
CC: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Björn Steinbrink
<B.Steinbrink@....de>, eranian@....hp.com, ak@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2
regression in 2.6.21)
Daniel Walker pisze:
[snip]
> Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
Yes, I have considered it.
Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
a regression field, but there are no difference between
2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.
Most people are reporting bugs through LKML:
- 23 regressions with reference to LKML
- 4 regressions with reference to Bugzilla
> If you had a
> search of open bugs they would just fall of the list as they get
> closed..
Unfortunately, the world is not perfect.
Is anyone interested in maintaining KR list for stable releases?
>
> Daniel
>
>
Regards,
Michal
--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists