linux-kernel - Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200
From:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
CC:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	Björn Steinbrink 
	<B.Steinbrink@....de>, eranian@....hp.com, ak@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2
 regression in 2.6.21)

Daniel Walker pisze:
[snip]
> Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?

Yes, I have considered it.

Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
a regression field, but there are no difference between
2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.

Most people are reporting bugs through LKML:
- 23 regressions with reference to LKML
- 4 regressions with reference to Bugzilla

> If you had a
> search of open bugs they would just fall of the list as they get
> closed.. 

Unfortunately, the world is not perfect.

Is anyone interested in maintaining KR list for stable releases?

> 
> Daniel
> 
> 

Regards,
Michal

-- 
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/