lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46D2DADF.8060505@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:08:31 +0200
From:	Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@...il.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: arch_align_stack() seems useless

Hello folks,

I recently pick up the implementation of arch_align_stack() from x86
architectures to make it available for mips.

But now I just realised that this function seems useless because of
the way it's used.

Currently, this function seems to be only used to randomize the stack
pointer inside a page during an execve() syscall. Only i386, x86_64
and recently mips do that. Here is the code taken from exec.c which
calls it:

	int setup_arg_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
			    unsigned long stack_top,
			    int executable_stack)
	{
		[...]
	
		stack_top = arch_align_stack(stack_top);
		stack_top = PAGE_ALIGN(stack_top);
	
		[...]
	}

Since PAGE_ALIGN() is called right after arch_align_stack(), it seems
to me that the call to the latter function is useless...

Am I missing something ?

thanks

		Franck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ