[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46D3095A.6020305@qumranet.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:26:50 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>
CC: kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Implement emulator_write_phys()
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 18:45 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> Since a hypercall may span two pages and is a gva, we need a function to write
>>> to a gva that may span multiple pages. emulator_write_phys() seems like the
>>> logical choice for this.
>>>
>>> @@ -962,8 +962,35 @@ static int emulator_write_std(unsigned long addr,
>>> unsigned int bytes,
>>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu
>>>
>> I think that emulator_write_emulated(), except for being awkwardly
>> named, should do the job. We have enough APIs.
>>
>> But! We may not overwrite the hypercall instruction while a vcpu may be
>> executing, since there's no atomicity guarantee for code fetch. We have
>> to to be out of guest mode while writing that insn.
>>
>
>
> Hrm, good catch.
>
> How can we get out of guest mode given SMP guest support?
>
>
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() is something that can be generalized.
Basically, you set a bit in each vcpu and send an IPI to take them out.
But that's deadlock prone and complex. Maybe you can just take
kvm->lock, zap the mmu and the flush tlbs, and patch the instruction at
your leisure, as no vcpu will be able to map memory until the lock is
released.
--
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists