[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070827195851.GA25572@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:58:51 -0500
From: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@...rdog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.linux.org, hch@...radead.org,
james.bottomley@...eleye.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: fix error reporting for SG_IO
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:10:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:53:54 -0500
> "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@...rdog.cca.cpqcorp.net> wrote:
>
> > This fixes a problem with the way cciss was filling out the "errors"
> > field of the request structure upon completion of requests.
> > Previously, it just put a 1 or a 0 in there and used the negation
> > of this as the uptodate parameter to one of the functions in the
> > block layer, being a block device. For the SG_IO ioctl, this was not
> > sufficient, and we noticed that, for example, sg_turs from sg3_utils
> > did not correctly detect problems due to cciss having set rq->errors
> > incorrectly.
>
> Do we think this problem is sufficiently serious to merit merging
> this (largeish) patch into 2.6.23?
>
> I'm thinking "no", but that might be wrong...
We'd like to see it 2.6.23. It may help insulate me from lots of questions
about where it is. :) But it's entirely up to you.
mikem
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists