[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070827211003.GA10627@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:10:03 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
* Christoph Lameter (clameter@....com) wrote:
> I think the simplest solution may be to leave slub as done in the patch
> that we developed last week. The arch must provide a cmpxchg_local that is
> performance wise the fastest possible. On x86 this is going to be the
> cmpxchg_local on others where cmpxchg is slower than interrupt
> disable/enable this is going to be the emulation that does
>
> interrupt disable
>
> cmpchg simulation
>
> interrupt enable
>
>
> If we can establish that this is not a performance regression then we have
> a clean solution source code wise. It also minimizes the interrupt holdoff
> for the non-cmpxchg_local arches. However, it means that we will have to
> disable interrupts twice for the slow path. If that is too expensive then
> we need a different solution.
>
cmpxchg_local is not used on the slow path... ?
Did you meant:
it means that we will have to disable preemption _and_ interrupts on the
fast path for non-cmpxchg_local arches ?
Or maybe am I thinking about the wrong code snippet there ?
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists