linux-kernel - Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46D29C3D.5070801@garzik.org>
Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:41:17 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
	Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
	eranian@....hp.com, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2
 regression in 2.6.21)

Andrew Morton wrote:
> What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> getting lost.  Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?

Maybe this was a dumb assumption on my part, but I thought regressions 
were getting rolled over into the next release's list, if they are not 
solved?

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/