linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC][PATCH] clustered writeback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070827050336.6a7e8e16@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:03:36 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
	Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC][PATCH] clustered writeback

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:21:52 +0800
> 
> Because it does the work in small batches of 10 inodes, when the
> system has <=10 dirty inodes, its behavior will reduce to:
> - do a full sweep *at once* on every 25s
> Which means the disk will flicker once every 25s, not bad :)

25 seconds is quite not good already though.... it takes a disk a
second or two of no activity to go into low power mode, every 25
seconds means you now have at least a 10% constant power cost....

I don't know the right answer (well other than "make sure inodes aren't
dirty", which involves fixing apps to not do as much file operations,
as well as relatime) but just "every 25s is no big deal" isn't really
the case ;-(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/