[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070827075317.GB2060@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:53:17 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: vgoyal@...ibm.com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation
Hi!
> > Does this make sense?
>
> Yes, this is a sensible optimization. But I think it may be better to
> make bootloader load kernel D directly into a specified memory location.
> For example, we can add a option to "kernel" command of grub.
>
> And, I think we can do more in bootloader. Such as we can prepare
> two
Yes, that would be nice.
It will mean quite a bit of work, but I guess it should be the long
term goal. Loading restore kernel directly from bootloader means:
1) it is fast -- no need to boot another kernel
2) it is "classical" way of doing things
On the other hand, we loose flexibility that way:
1) it locks you onto one bootloader
2) you no longer have userland there to do uncompression, decryption,
etc..
Pave
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists