lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:08:45 -0700
From:	"Michael Evans" <mjevans1983@...il.com>
To:	"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	"Michael J. Evans" <mjevans1983@...cast.net>,
	"Neil Brown" <neilb@...e.de>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v3 1/1] md: Software Raid autodetect dev list not array

On 8/27/07, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> Michael J. Evans wrote:
> > On Monday 27 August 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:16:21 -0700 Michael J. Evans wrote:
> >>
> >>> =============================================================
> >>> --- linux/drivers/md/md.c.orig      2007-08-21 03:19:42.511576248 -0700
> >>> +++ linux/drivers/md/md.c   2007-08-21 04:30:09.775525710 -0700
> >>> @@ -24,4 +24,6 @@
> >>>
> >>> +   - autodetect dev list not array: Michael J. Evans
> > <mjevans1983@...il.com>
> >>> +
> >> Nowadays we use an SCM for such comments, not the source file(s).
> >
> > SCM?  Is this automatic, where do I go to see it?
>
> See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
> 14) The canonical patch format:
>
> The canonical patch message body contains the following:
>
>   - A "from" line specifying the patch author.
>
>   - An empty line.
>
>   - The body of the explanation, which will be copied to the
>     permanent changelog to describe this patch.
>
>   - The "Signed-off-by:" lines, described above, which will
>     also go in the changelog.
>
>   - A marker line containing simply "---".
>
>   - Any additional comments not suitable for the changelog.
>
>   - The actual patch (diff output).
>
>
> so just put whatever you want to be in the permanent SCM logs
> into the "body of the explanation" part of the email.
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
>

Oh, I see.  I forgot about the changelogs.  I'd send out version 5
now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch against.
2.6.23-rc4 is on kernel.org and I don't see any git snapshots.
Additionally I never could tell what git tree was the 'mainline' as it
isn't labeled with such a keyword (at least in the list of git trees I
saw).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ