linux-kernel - Re: [patch v3 1/1] md: Software Raid autodetect dev list not array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4877c76c0708281010x4597a9cfpc252dc4ee2a0ef9e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:10:05 -0700
From:	"Michael Evans" <mjevans1983@...il.com>
To:	"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	"Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@....com>,
	"Michael J. Evans" <mjevans1983@...cast.net>,
	"Neil Brown" <neilb@...e.de>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v3 1/1] md: Software Raid autodetect dev list not array

On 8/28/07, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> Michael Evans wrote:
> > On 8/28/07, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> wrote:
> >> Michael Evans wrote:
> >>> Oh, I see.  I forgot about the changelogs.  I'd send out version 5
> >>> now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch against.
> >>> 2.6.23-rc4 is on kernel.org and I don't see any git snapshots.
> >>> Additionally I never could tell what git tree was the 'mainline' as it
> >>> isn't labeled with such a keyword (at least in the list of git trees I
> >>> saw).
> >>
> >> I suspect you wait for 2.5.23 release, or send it to AKPM for inclusion
> >> in an "-mm" kernel. That's probably desirable, anyway.
> >>
> >> --
> >
> > There's another list I should CC to?  Or does the section maintainer
> > do that when they're happy with the patch?
>
> Not another list; just cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org so that he can merge
> it into the -mm kernel patches for testing.  Most patches cook in the -mm
> kernel(s) before they are merged into mainline.
>
> Then generally the subsystem maintainer(s) are responsible for sending
> patches on to Linus for merging into mainline, if/when they are happy
> with the patch and they think that it has been tested enough.
>

So I should look at the git documentation again, try to pull down
Andrew's latest -mm, and see what I need to change (if anything) to
patch against it?  (I would probably only verify that boots once my
self given the other testing this has already seen and how often mm
breaks things my mythtv box likes, such as nvidia-drivers, etc,)

> Mainline progresses (roughly, e.g.) like so:
>

I knew about the progression order (but not timing) of the non-git
side of it, but it was helpful to have the whole thing spelled out,
thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/