linux-kernel - Re: [patch v3 1/1] md: Software Raid autodetect dev list not array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4877c76c0708281211s55aded4ajceb283da25223659@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:11:15 -0700
From:	"Michael Evans" <mjevans1983@...il.com>
To:	"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	"Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@....com>,
	"Michael J. Evans" <mjevans1983@...cast.net>,
	"Neil Brown" <neilb@...e.de>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v3 1/1] md: Software Raid autodetect dev list not array

On 8/28/07, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> Michael Evans wrote:
> > On 8/28/07, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >> Michael Evans wrote:
> >>> On 8/28/07, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> wrote:
> >>>> Michael Evans wrote:
> >>>>> Oh, I see.  I forgot about the changelogs.  I'd send out version 5
> >>>>> now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch against.
> >>>>> 2.6.23-rc4 is on kernel.org and I don't see any git snapshots.
> >>>>> Additionally I never could tell what git tree was the 'mainline' as it
> >>>>> isn't labeled with such a keyword (at least in the list of git trees I
> >>>>> saw).
> >>>> I suspect you wait for 2.5.23 release, or send it to AKPM for inclusion
> >>>> in an "-mm" kernel. That's probably desirable, anyway.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>> There's another list I should CC to?  Or does the section maintainer
> >>> do that when they're happy with the patch?
> >> Not another list; just cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org so that he can merge
> >> it into the -mm kernel patches for testing.  Most patches cook in the -mm
> >> kernel(s) before they are merged into mainline.
> >>
> >> Then generally the subsystem maintainer(s) are responsible for sending
> >> patches on to Linus for merging into mainline, if/when they are happy
> >> with the patch and they think that it has been tested enough.
> >>
> >
> > So I should look at the git documentation again, try to pull down
> > Andrew's latest -mm, and see what I need to change (if anything) to
> > patch against it?  (I would probably only verify that boots once my
> > self given the other testing this has already seen and how often mm
> > breaks things my mythtv box likes, such as nvidia-drivers, etc,)
>
> -mm is available only as a patchset, not via git.
> There has been a git version of it, but it's not currently working and
> hasn't been for 2 months or so.
>
> I mostly use the grab_kernel script that I mentioned.  It knows how
> to download linux-2.6.M and how to apply -rcN, -gitN, and/or -mmN
> patches to the base (linux-2.6.M).
>
> E.g.:
> grab_kernel 2.6.23-rc3-git6 $PWD
> or
> grab_kernel 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 $PWD
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
>

Gentoo's mm-sources is version 2.6.23-rc3-mm1, which I'd guess is
close enough for an area like this.  Given that I didn't need to make
any changes to the patch should I just submit it to the mm for testing
without rebooting in to an mm-sources kernel?  I need to schedule when
I do that so it would take me overnight to do so.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/